Personal Experience and Readings
Science is one of my favorite subjects because of the possibilities of making new elements with other elements. I am well versed in conduction titration in science as I find it and explorative activity in developing new chemicals from a process. I understand processes such as titration of acids and bases, which form major questions in science practical science experiments. It is one of the essential procedures of the laboratory. For conduct of this process an individual requires the presence of equipment as follows, burette, white tile that is used to see change in color in the aqueous solution, a pipette. A PH indicator, which is dependent on the reactors, an Erlenmeyer flask/ Conical flask, a titrator that is of a known concentration such as Sodium Carbonate and an analyte, which is of a known solution. Acid and base concentration determines the kind of indicator level to be used. High indicators are used for concentrated chemicals and lower indicators for low concentration acids and bases. Color change is observed in such experiments if the chemicals or reactants develop a new product with a new color. This is usually called the end when the two chemicals form a new color product or chemical in the reaction. w
The laboratory is described as an important part of scientific studies. This is because numerous scientific ideas and knowledge has been discovered and furthered in the laboratory. Hence, there is the presence of what theorists like Sir Karl Popper define as science in reality and pseudo science. This is applicable in society in that pseudo science meets the truth. Hence, severally science discovers the truth about issues out of fate. On the other hand, science at times discovers truth out of the resilience, persistence and effort of the scientist (Lynch, & Cole, 2005).
In the laboratory, discoveries could assume either perspectives of pseudo science or science. Science is different from pseudo science as it relies on inductiveness, observation and experiment. Thus, the laboratory provides information because of the inductive process, observation of elements at study. Additionally science and society are intertwined in that science aims at helping society understand practically all issues, events and elements in the world. Science is a vats field, which has focus on different issues. This diversity has enabled the overall growth of the society.
It has been found out that the laboratory is one of the important area meant for scientific studies in that numerous scientific ideas and knowledge about science and the social being has been discovered and furthered in the laboratory. Hence, there is the presence of what theorists like Sir Karl Popper define as science in reality and pseudo science. This is applicable in society in that pseudo science meets the truth. Therefore, several scientists discovers the truth about issues out of fate. On the other hand, science at times discovers truth out of the resilience, persistence and effort of the scientist.
Theories, which have been existent, obtain authenticity through the act of confirmation. Confirmation takes place through the evaluation and verification of the elements and issues at the heart of scientific studies. Science has been in existence as it seeks to establish the civilization of society as well as provide means through which society could progress or increase its civility. Scientific discoveries such as those of the early “homenoids” have aided studies in the history and origin of man (Sims, 2005). In the titration process, conformation takes place through visualization of the change in color of the experiment or the reach of an endpoint in the reaction.
The laboratory is used to enforce the knowledge gained from a classroom. Additionally, individuals are tasked with determining the validity of the information gained from the classroom by conducting experiments in the laboratory. There is an increased awareness that for students to succeed in science they must engage in actual conduct mimicking scientists. This would ensure that an individual is able to prepare for tasks associated with science (Merton, 1938).
Like other experiments, conduction titration is conducted on trial and error basis. I can refer it as a step by step, and progress process that see the scientist bring on board more and more applications with the sole purpose of coming up with dependable and approvable outcome. For scientists it take resilience and persistence as well as the ability to bring on board the existing knowledge, to correctly identify the gaps and the way to approach them. Thus, everyday there could be a new development and challenge. On the other hand, field discoveries are usually based on pseudo science in that, they are determined by fate. Interactions are therefore highly encouraged for criticisms, contributions and proper conclusions. As a competitive field any determined scientist is protected by solitariness norm for the scientists to keep information about their discoveries with the aim of claiming such discoveries to the world of science. This is important for making individual progress in terms of careers in a specific scientific field. However before any inferences are made about the scientific differences the norm of skepticism is applied for scrutiny of the scientific discovery. Hence, the scientific world has to work with the sociological world to yield desired results.
This experiment clearly outlines that scientific research is a complementary aspect and not supplementary. This is because as may thing that you produced a substitute you can only learn tomorrow that it was a complement. This means that one is confronted with a situation in the real world seeks available information about it and then ventures to the field to seek more clarity. The information gathered is then compared with the existing through analysis an then recommendations and conclusions are made. Hence, new knowledge is created and a further window is opened for more probes into the question at hand. The new knowledge can be presented as theories or models among others that constitute a solution to the particular issue (Strevens, 2006).
The whole concepts of research, the process of research, the findings and ultimate solutions especially in conduction titration works to create discipline, independence as well as interdependence values in learners and their professors or role models. Through this scientific probe they are able to discipline themselves in terms of how they manage their time, approach issues and commend on various aspects in life. At the same time they learn to be independent by being decisive, self-motivated and result oriented on what they undertake. In so doing students learn to be interdependent because they need the society to provide a solution to and the society needs them to give it solutions. Thus, a system of dependence is created and more and more values that shape and transform a society are acquired and kept. Hence, a multi-dimensional approach is adopted in the society and within individuals.
Titration experience shows that scientific fields are a dynamic field that is also social in nature. As scientists seek for new knowledge or new outcomes in the field they require to perform more and more repeated experiments to acquire enough data for analysis and conclusion that are both accurate and appropriate. This in turn calls for even more sophisticated equipment and enhanced research methods. This means that for better and useful conclusions then continuous innovations and improvements have to be done in terms of equipment and methods of research. These scientists require even better training to be able to use the new facilities and equipments. This social environment brings together several problem solvers to solve a single social issue. Science thrives in a well coordinated and protected social environment, that continuously showcase tribulations and provides windows for problem solvers to take center stage in searching for the way forward. Hence neither science nor society is complete without interacting with the other in one way or the other and developing some necessary norms and values as guidelines as titration tells it all in its outcomes.
One the interactions are on course, the impact of science on the society is seen through the number of solutions that the society is able to enumerate as achieved. In case of the titration experiment where different colors emerge from a chemical reaction different aspects representing different contents in a matter are established. Through this many applications can be found for a particular substance. This may comprise of different solutions to different issues. In society, this can be reflected in the featuring of new products from the materials. Hence, the overall change in the standards of living and lifestyle of a people through use of the products and/or creation of an opportunity for employment, unemployment, and other side effects.
In summary, titration as a science has taken over in the whole society in that, it assumes some fields such as sociology, physics, mathematics, psychology among others. All of the identified fields are concerned with the need to alleviate issues in the society rather than support it. Titration, as an experiment has created many solutions as problems. The solutions have been mainly in differentiating the coloration in a particular substance, hence the separation of these contents to fit different situations. This is a big solution to learners in the contemporary society. However, it also posses problems, for instance when color is differentiated then what next. Many other problems present themselves initiating different norms in event of solution search. Hence, scientific research is dynamic, complementary and fast growing with enhanced need for solutions.
Reference
Giles, J. (January 01, 2006). “The trouble with replication” Nature, 442, (7101), pp.344-413.
Husu, L. (December 01, 2001). “On metaphors on the position of women in academia and science” Nora – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 9, 3, Pp. 172-181.
Lund, M. D. (2010). N. R. Hanson: Observation, discovery, and scientific change. Amherst, N.Y: Humanity Books.
Lynch, M., & Cole, S. (January 01, 2005). “Science and Technology Studies on Trial” Social Studies of Science, 35, 2,Pp. 269-311.
Merton, R. K. (July 01, 1938). “Science and the Social Order” Philosophy of Science, 5, 3, Pp.321-337.
Mitroff, I. I. (August 01, 1974). “Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists” American Sociological Review, 39, 4, Pp. 579-595.
Sims, B. (January 01, 2005). “Safe Science” Social Studies of Science, 35, 3, Pp. 333-366.
Strevens, M. (June 01, 2006). “The role of the Matthew effect in science” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 2, Pp. 159-170.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]