According to this article https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2016/07/upside-down-economics
\”permanent tax cuts for the very rich would be expected to have a multiplier far smaller than tax cuts for poorer workers or direct spending.\” Why would government spending have more of an effect on demand than tax cuts for the very rich?
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.