Realism vs. Liberalism

n the study of international organization and international law both the Pease and Rochester texts have given alternative theoretical approaches to the study of international organization and international law. Using the Pease and Rochester texts compare the two approaches of realism and liberalism/idealism that the two authors present. Discuss the assumptions that each author makes about the two approaches. What assumptions does each of these approaches make about human nature, the behavior of nation-states in terms of their own perceived national interests and the relations that nation-states have with each other? Are either (or both) of the authors optimistic about the improvement of the relations among the nation-states based on more effective international organizations and more compliance with international law? Based on what you have learned in this class, are you more or less optimistic about the roles that international organization and international law can play in creati

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]