Reducing prejudice and stereotyping

Reducing prejudice and stereotyping

Cognitive Psychology

The focus of Cognitive Psychology is majorly on the thoughts, understanding and knowledge of individuals. This theory emphasizes on how individuals comprehend and perceive their real world through their mind. In addition, it is also concerned on how such perceptions and thinking influences their behavior. In the perspective of learning, it involves the changing of information from a particular environment setting into knowledge that is stored in the individual’s mind. Learning happens when new knowledge is obtained or the extant knowledge is transformed through experience. Cognitive theories emphasize on the aspect of thinking consciously, and represent a positive view of development. Vygotsky and Piaget theories for instance, emphasizes on the construction of an individual’s mind in understanding. The two theories underscore the significance of evaluating developmental variations especially with regard to thoughts of learners (Lahey, 2004).

In essence, the main view in cognitive   information processing is that a learner is much like a processor of information in the same way a computer is. In the process of learning, information obtained from the environment is processed and kept in the human mind; it then comes out in the form of a learned knowledge. According to cognitive psychologists, the environment is the major factor, which is used to modify human behavior. Most cognitive theories were derived from Shiffrin and Atkinson (1968) concept  which posted that  the information  obtained  in the  human processing system  undergoes a sequence of  transformation  before being stored  in the brain. According to Lahey, (2004), there are three main constituencies of memory, these includes, short-term memory, sensory memory and long-term memory.

 

Relations Cognitive Psychology and Creation of Competency of Test Items

Many people have come to believe that learners fail simply because they are not motivated to succeed. This means that a learner’s failure cannot be related with him or her getting low grade. Under the current evaluation systems, it is required for learners to pass standardized tests in order to proceed with two extra years in high school education, college education and good jobs. Those who fail would not be able access high paying jobs with good salary. However, some states have abandoned the idea of excluding individuals from all employments based on their educational performance. This has prompted the government to direct states in establishing appropriate assessment measures to all learners, and which should not be employed as an exit or stage exam for these learners (Tan et al, 2009).

There have been arguments that the high-stakes academic competency test items do not effectively measure the learning expectations for the learners. According to these critics, the high stakes tests should be replaced with the continuous evaluation tests such as the conventional grades. It has also been perceived that  the term excellence  is better defined as  the level which can be achieved  even by the  most weak  learner (Vander, 2008).

The high stakes tests have ultimately been the cause of too many students dropping out of school. In addition, many graduates as can be witnessed in recent trends are incompetent in their work places. The movement of standard has rejected the idea that some learners perform better that others and few of them succeed and go to the highest levels. The concept of cognitive psychology relates that all learners learn in processes and that each learner has a different cognitive level. This means that continuous improvement should be applied to all learners “clever” or “weak” in order to scrap the gap between and among social groups. Moreover, the opportunities accorded to high performing learners should also be opened to the different learners in order to create social justice (Tan et al, 2009).

Relation of Cognitive Psychology and Stereotyping in High Stakes Test Items

Individuals who may be negatively stereotyped in specific areas such as the performance of women in science and mathematic subjects may be in danger of stereotyping. This may be a concern that they may be viewed through the stereotyped or negative lens (Aronson & Steele, 2008). Research  has indicated  that the high stakes test performance  by groups which are stereotyped  such as Latinos, black Americans and ladies  decreases  when it is emphasized to the  particular group that a) the test is  expected to measure  one’s  intelligence  b) the test is  of high stakes  and c) the test is an ethnic, gender or race  competency measurement. These is mostly done when the assessors asks individuals to complete a questionnaire which is supposed to capture their demographic background. Even if people had a belief that they were competent enough, the threat of stereotyping may hinder their cognitive memory in the process of suppressing these negative stereotyping on them. In particular, the threat of stereotyping is more influential to people who have a desire to performing exceptionally. The performance of in high stakes academic tests for people that are stereotyped may not portray the true aspect of their competency in circumstances involving low stakes testing.

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its

            control processes. New York: Academic Press. pp. 89–195.

Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2008). Stereotypes and the Fragility of Academic Competence,

            Motivation, and Self-Concept  Guilford Publications, New York

 

Lahey, B. B. (2004).  Psychology: an introduction. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.

 

Tan O. S., Richard D., Parson, S (2009).Educational Psychology. Singapore: Thomson Learning

 

Vander A (2008). The new proposition of the standards movement. California, Berryessa

School District,

 

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]