What is Justice to me: What is justice to me shaped by political philsophers
What is justice to me shaped by political philsophers.
-Use philosphers as a way to back up my defintion justice.
-On the other hand, use philosophers as a way to counterproof why its not my theory of justice.
Thesis: Justice is when there is a genuine respect for all kinds of people.
This means that the society should be without discrimination of race, ethchinicty, religion and so on.
This may occur when there is equality and fairness in every action conducted.
(You can make this thesis better, just a general idea of thesis)
These are the Political philosophers (Please use most of them either for argument (proof) or for counterargument (counter proof).
John Rawls. (For equality in opportunity)
Immanuel Kant (Good in itself: universaility, do to others what you want others to do to you. a priori concept of good: Good cannot be defined by any experience or consequence)
Robert Nozick. (Minimalistic: State should not do anything to transfer your state right, hayek, adam smith, Milton friedman – supporters free market)
John Stuart Mill – Utilitairianism
Ayn Rand – Egoism
Aristotle – A person is good only when he performs his function in the society well.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]