Hello, please answer these questions: For question (1) I don’t need nor introduction or conclusion, I need you to talk in depth. (1) Respond to the following questions/prompts: a- Respond to the “What Would You Do?” on pp. 224-225 in the textbook. b- Respond to the “What Do You Think?” on p. 249 in the textbook. c- Based on all of your readings for weeks 9 & 10, at what aspect of staff management do you think you will excel? Why? What aspect terrifies you the most? Why? Instructions and reading for week 10: 1- In this textbook, read Chapters 10,11 & 12 Moran, B. B., Stueart, R. D., & Morner, C. J. (2012). Library and information center management (8th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. 2- Locate and read this article : The Accidental Library Manager [Chapter 3] Gordon R.S. Publication: 57-89 Publisher: Information Today: Medford, NJ, 2005 also this article: Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M., Nadal, K.L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271-286. 3- Review the HR Dos and Don’ts (an expanded version of the table on p. 209 of the textbook) at https://www.hr.uillinois.edu/cms/One.aspx?portalId=4292&pageId=5918
(2)please talk about this discussion, and i don’t need introduction or conclusion. Also , please but your thoughts and don’t use a lot of quotation.
1- Digitized vs Analog Most digital collections consist of digital resources that are digitized versions of original analog resources. What issues commonly arise for implementers when creating metadata for these resources? What is the One-to-One Principle? What is the ideal and what is the most common actual method of dealing with recording properties and values for a digitized resource and its analog original when creating single records in digital collection databases today? Cite examples from the readings
Readings:
Miller Foreword, Preface, Chapters 1-2 Hicks, E. A., Perkins, J., & Maurer, M. B. (2007). Application profile development for consortial digital libraries: An OhioLINK case study. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(2), 116-131. Preview the documentView in a new window(Great discussion of functional requirements for digital collections and detailed description of the application profile development process.) Martin, K. E. (2011). Marrying local metadata needs with accepted standards: The creation of a data dictionary at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Journal of Library Metadata, 11(1), 33-50. DOI:10.1080/19386389.2011.545006Preview the documentView in a new window Park, J., & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3). DOI:10.6017/ital.v29i3.3136Preview the documentView in a new window Rettig, P. J., Liu, S., Hunter, N., & Level, A. V.(2009). Developing a metadata best practices model: The experience of the Colorado State University Libraries. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(4), 315-339. doi:10.1080/19386380802656371.Preview the documentView in a new window
please make an annotated bibliography for this article Disaster Planning for Your Library. By: Knisely, Susan; Behrhorst, Shannon. Nebraska Library Association Quarterly , Spring2006, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p8-14, 7p Subjects: Nebraska; Disasters; Library planning — Nebraska instructions -Read the article, keeping in mind that you will be writing a critical, evaluative annotation of approximately 150 words. You will want to pay attention to the logic of the argument made by the author/s, the quality of the evidence, if and how the article is useful to others exploring the topic, etc. – Write the citation for the article, following the 6th edition of the APA Manual. Write the annotation for the article, which should be proportioned in the following manner: – No more than ½ of the annotation (75 words) should be descriptive (a summary of the qualifications of the author/s, the research methods, the arguments, etc.) – No less than ½ of the annotation (75 words) should be evaluative (your critical analysis of the quality of the article, as described in Number 2 above). Thanks
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]